Who thinks organs speak?
Increasingly similar stories are emerging from recipients of organ transplants. Certain individuals report changes in habits, inclination, personality, idiosyncrasies and taste preferences that did not present before the transplant. Could your degree of spiritual awareness affect the acceptance or rejection of a transplant or the idea of donating? Who would have thought;
1) Individual cells could have extended consciousness.
2) Personality dissipates in energy fragments.
3) Physical bodies may be violated before the spirit leaves them
4) The spirit of a dead donor may attach itself to the recipient.
5) A donor soul may be earthbound due to this attachment.
6) Life is not limited to neurological phenomena.
7) What seems impossible scientifically, is not spiritually.
Reader Comments (12)
I wonder if the same would happen to terminally ill patients - such as my mother .. ie they give their trust to me to hold on their behalf, which then gives them the power of continued life on this earth until they are ready to go.
The world is opening up so much for us ..
Hilary Melton-Butcher
Positive Letters
I find that whole concept intriguing. Perhaps this is another way for humans to be immortal. It takes the phrase 'vicarious' to a whole other level. ;D
Neuroscientist V.S. Ramachandran has a book “Phantoms in the Brain” which is a very open account into conscousness. Ramachandran asserts that there is actually no recognised centre of conscousness in the brain. The book is an acceptance from the scientific world of the possibility of a spiritual factor. There is also material on phantom limbs and personality change
The book is available also as an e-book (I don’t know if it’s edited)….you can obtain it here.
http://www.jpans.com/ebook/phantoms-in-the-brain.html
xhenry
http://www.amazon.com/Genie-Your-Genes-Epigenetic-Intention/dp/1600700225
1) Fight-or-flight response
2) Reactive response
3) Restful awareness response
4) Intutive response
5) Creative response
6) Visionary response
70 Divine or sacred response